Do BOTH! LIGHTLY during. And your usual thorough great journalism, after.... Thanks
1 month ago | 8
Either or, bud. Your unique, unbiased approach is good, and that's why I listen.
1 month ago | 13
Personally i dont like live commentary cuz you cant hear the candidates talking and we miss certain points
1 month ago | 25
Do it after. We want to hear the debate with clean audio. And then hear someone tear it apart after. But regardless of what you do, after the debate I will come consume your content as well
1 month ago | 25
If you do it during the debate it will cause confusion on what You /They are saying. If you do it somewhat live kind of like people do reaction videos ,where you listen and pause it would be cool 😎 Thanks for all your hard work and glad to see you back at it for now at least. Keep giving it all you got and if it gets overwhelming again look for help with someone/people you can trust. This is coming from someone who has run a small business for 20 years and have had similar thoughts when it has felt to be to much. Also be very intentional if you are praying for strength in life, hard trials will make you stronger but it's not always fun. Thanks Brotha
1 month ago | 9
Personally, I will be watching the debate in its entirety on my own before I hear any commentary or analysis on it. I don’t want to miss any part of it, and I also want to form my own opinion first!
1 month ago | 4
Personally I like the slightly more condensed 8-20 minute scripted videos you do with the concise commentary that you've clearly had some time to mull over in your head and properly clarify/expand on your thoughts, but the live stuff is good too—always insightful. The shorter scriped ones just retain my attention a lot better and get the point across more succinctly imo
1 month ago | 5
Do it after to process your thoughts and fact check things. Folks who react live typically have bad takes
1 month ago | 11
I'm leaning "after". During would be cool, but you I think you could do a better analysis post-debate. You can pull up reference material and go deeper when you're able to pause the debate. I'll watch you either way bro.
1 month ago (edited) | 3
I’m not too sure how many people will be listening to you and trying to listen to the debate at the same time
1 month ago | 1
It would be cool to do something different from what you've done in the past. But I also prefer you doing it after. Analysis sometimes requires you to go deep into subject matter... And once you do that, you could miss important points mentioned live in the debate. + We all know debates are nothing but shenanigans nowadays. My vote is "Do it after" with your analysis on your favorite moments of the debate.
1 month ago | 1
I voted for "after" but I don't really mind. I will likely only watch your recap and not the actual debate
1 month ago | 1
An0maly - News Analysis & Hip-hop
Would it be cool if I live-streamed during the entire? debate & gave my reaction as it was happening or would you rather me make a video right after?
1 month ago | [YT] | 361