As a researcher myself (and acknowledging my own bias here), I have to admit that I'm a bit disappointed with how this conversation is presented, particularly "researchers are flooding the space with controversial advice". Yes, it is absolutely true that some researchers (e.g. Huberman types) are either prematurely or inaccurately drawing and claiming significance from studies where we just don't have enough research yet to support any conclusions. That said, it is also equally true that some physicians (e.g. Dr. Gundry and Dr. Oz types) are doing the exact same thing. Respectfully, it appears biased and inaccurate to phrase this issue as if researchers are the sole contributors to controversial or questionable advice. I think the take home message should be less about "Doctors vs. Researchers", and more about how people should always be skeptical of ANYONE whose presenting "research" or advice outside their area of expertise and/or followed by something to sell-- this goes for both physicians and researchers. There's a reason why large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are considered the "gold standard" of scientific research: because anyone (MD, PhD, DO, etc.) is capable of exhibiting bias!
1 month ago
| 124
The issue with him is he is neither a researcher nor a scientist. I get so frustrated when he misrepresents scientific principles. Unfortunately, science is very light in med school curricula.
1 month ago | 2
When are you going to address Grapefruits and medication interactions because of of cytochrome enzymes. Explains.
1 month ago | 1
Thanks very much for working with me on this video! I realise this is a very nuanced topic to cover, and wouldn’t have been able to do it without your input. I look forward to working with you again in the future if an opportunity arises!
1 month ago | 0
Hi dr Mike. I have been gone trough leg surgery. Surgeon made bone transfer surgeon ln my left leg. I would like you to make a video about how much your bidy gies trough surgery abd recovering feom that surgery. I know that it myst be lot , but i have no glue ho much it is in reality and what is gappening inside your body during and after surgery in detail.
1 month ago | 1
Will you please make a video about how do you get ingrown tooth thank you so much for your help
1 month ago | 1
One thing people need to remember is science isn't set in stone. It evolves as more information comes to light. Also, 2 people with different backgrounds and different experiences can look at the exact same information and come to 2 different conclusions. And both of them could be right!
1 month ago | 1
My name is Sarah Johnson. What happens if I have an ingrown tooth at 13 years old?
1 month ago | 1
Dr. Mike, you need both researchers and doctors! That’s why I’m a clinician in translational research.
1 month ago
| 17
Ik this is a little random but would u be able to react to an injury from a show called “find me in Paris” it’s season 2 episode 8 episode:”break a leg” a guy named Max gets injured.
1 month ago | 1
Neither. In fact, there's several aspects to that, which are causing a lot of difficulty in unsubtle and widespread ways. The issue is, that doctors are trained, then go practice, w the main methods for staying current being recertification, familiarisation courses, advanced courses, and which journals they can afford to access regularly, AND make time to read. Similarly, researchers train, find a research organisation, apply for funding, perform specific experiments or analyses, and publish. And tge funding swing and skews their areas of research a great deal. These systems were designed and fully adequate for the early decades of science and medicine; where thousands of researchers produced hundreds of papers. It isn't adequate for tens of millions researchers and hundred thousands of papers. And for science as a whole, the bottlenecks of journal choice, funding choice, and volume of papers are issues under discussion. Also dozens of related issues. Journal costs, accreditation costs, insurance costs, the slant value/accuracy value of paper, the number of published vs unpublished vs published but incorrect. Tge clarity of research language and how complex bs limits any access and impact. It's becoming apparent that there's too much information for Any single person, group or individual to keep informed of. But there's no consensus on solutions, either; again because there are far Too Many people involved today these systems were conceived to function for.
1 month ago | 4
This video is very good however it would be unfair to just call this a problem of scientists/ researchers. It is not impossible to find physicians who contribute to the problems mentioned in the videos. At the end of the day it should be about spreading an honest, nuanced an valid message. This is not limited to profession
1 month ago | 4
!! I am at the beginning of my "investment journey" , planning to put 385k into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% annually in dividend returns. any good recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
1 month ago | 2
Hello dr mike my sister wants to become a doctor so would you say there are more pros than cons or would you say the opposite. Also what field do you recommend for her to be in. Do you think that the medical field is good? And how many years do you have to go to college? Do you get burnout?
1 month ago | 7
Doctor Mike
Great video on what it's like to be a creator AND physician at a time when CONTROVERSIAL researchers are flooding the space with QUESTIONABLE advice
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 1,599