the last judgment begins with a scene where the eaten must pass judgment on the eaters. this is just the beginning, though. this is not really the last judgment. even if the eaten denunciate the eaters, that can't be the end of it. living things are only a small part of existence. in the end, what matters is not the world of the living, but the ontological foundation of the existence - zero and infinity. even if living things denounce other living things, it is hardly the last judgment. that's the critical argument. what it is really saying is that the very concept of the last judgment is wrong. what is needed is not the last judgment, but the ontological revolution in existence. we have to change the world, so that the eaten do not denunciate the eaters. the start of denunciation is in the eating, though. modern society avoids noticing this point, and in that sense i think denunciation by the eaten is significant - especially in europe.