COGNITIVE BIAS, THE AXIOLOGICAL QUESTION AND
THE EPISTEMIC PROBABILITY OF THEISTIC BELIEF
Daniel Linford & Jason Megill
Forthcoming. Ontology of Theistic Beliefs: Meta-Ontological Perspectives. Edited by
Miroslaw Szatkowski. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
The philosophy of religion addresses what can be called the “axiological
question,” i.e., regardless of whether God exists, would it be good or bad if God exists? Would
the existence of God make the world a better or a worse place? Call the view that the existence
of God would make the world a better place “Pro-Theism.” We argue that Pro-Theism is not
implausible, and moreover, many Theists, at least, (often implicitly) think that it is true.
We then argue that, as a result of certain cognitive biases that result
when good outcomes might be at stake, Pro-Theism causes many Theists to inflate the epistemic
probability that God exists, and as a result, Theists should lower the probability they assign to
God’s existence.
Shared 7 months ago
372 views
Shared 8 months ago
15 views
Shared 8 months ago
14 views
Shared 8 months ago
36 views
Shared 8 months ago
11 views
Shared 8 months ago
17 views
Shared 8 months ago
689 views
Shared 9 months ago
34 views
Shared 9 months ago
2.2K views
Shared 4 years ago
9.6K views
Shared 5 years ago
476 views
Shared 5 years ago
5.8K views
Shared 5 years ago
1.7K views
Shared 5 years ago
4.6K views
Shared 5 years ago
387 views
Shared 5 years ago
3K views
Shared 5 years ago
453 views
Shared 5 years ago
315 views
Shared 5 years ago
267 views
Shared 5 years ago
166 views
Shared 5 years ago
99 views
Shared 5 years ago
124 views
Shared 5 years ago
67 views
Shared 5 years ago
85 views
Shared 5 years ago
127 views
Shared 5 years ago
161 views
Shared 5 years ago
5.4K views
Shared 5 years ago
864 views
Shared 5 years ago
1.6K views
Shared 5 years ago
92K views
Shared 5 years ago
8.3K views
Shared 5 years ago
6.5K views
Shared 5 years ago
2K views
Shared 5 years ago
2.1K views